A budget allocation analysis and poverty alleviation strategy in Aceh post conflict and tsunami

Agussabti Agussabti, Jeliteng Pribadi, T Zulham, Sofyan Sofyan


This paper analyses budget allocation and poverty alleviation strategy in Aceh’s post conflict and tsunami. It is aimed (1) to identify conditions and the cause of poverty in Aceh, (2) to analyze poverty alleviation budget and programs in Aceh and (3) to find a suitable poverty alleviation strategy in post conflict and tsunami in Aceh.  The study was conducted in 2015-2016 using budget data of 2013 and 2014 collected from 7 districts in Aceh, 3 districts representing the west coast, 3 other representing the east coast, and 1 in the capital city of Banda Aceh. Meanwhile, the survey was conducted through in-depth interview technique reinforced by FGD in six districts i.e. Bener Meriah, Gayo Lues, Pidie Jaya, North Aceh, Aceh Barat, and Simeulue. The results show that Aceh’s poverty budget allocation is irrelevance and inconsistent. This is allegedly due to the limited capacity and commitment of decision makers to poverty alleviation. Poverty in Aceh is caused by natural, structural and cultural problems. The budget allocations for poverty alleviation programs are not well managed and unstructured and thus tend to be less effective in reducing poverty in Aceh. It is recommended that poverty alleviation strategies in Aceh should optimize the development of rural sectors such as agriculture, livestock, fisheries, poultry, dairy, and handicrafts, by stimulating the involvement and coordination of wider stakeholders.

Full Text:



Babbie, E. 1992. The Practice of Social Research (Sixth Edition). California: Wads-worth Publishing Company.

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Banda Aceh in Figures 2014. Banda Aceh

Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and Lvelihoods: Whose Reality Counts. Environment and Urbanization, 173-204.

Chambers, R., & Conway, GR (1992). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper 296. Brighton, UK: institute of Development Studies.

Doyal, L. and Ian G. 1991. A Theory of Human Need. London: MacMillan Education, Ltd.

Eriklane, J. 1995. The Public Sector: Concept, Models, and Approach. SAGE.

Goodman, RM, Speers, MA, Mcleroy, K., Fawcett, S., Kegler, M., Parker, E., et al. (1998). Identifying and Defining the Dimension of Community Capacity to Provide a Basis for Measurement. Health and Education Behavior, 25, 258-278.

Herbert, P. 2001. The DAC Guidelines Poverty Reduction.

Handler, Joel F. and Hasenfeld, Yeheskel, (2007). Blame Welfare: Ignore Poverty and Inequality, Cambridge University Press, NY., USA.

Haughton, Jonathan and Khandker, Shahidur R., (2009). Handbook on Poverty and Inequality, World Bank, Washington DC., USA.

Ife, J. (2002). Community Development: Community-based Alternative in an age of globalization. Australia: Pearson Education.

Jha, AK, Barenstein, JD, Phelps, PM, Pittet, D., & Sena, S. (2010). Safer Homes, Stronger Communities: A Handbook for Reconstruction after Natural Disaster. Washington: The World Bank.

Korten, D. (1993). Towards the 21st Century: Voluntary Measures and the Global Agenda of People-centered Development Forums. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia and Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Laverack, G. (2001). An Indentification and Interpretation of the Organizational Aspects of Community Empowerment. Community Development Journal, 36 (2), 134-145.

Mardikanto, T. (2010). Models of Community Empowerment. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Phillips, R., & Pittman, RH (2009). A framework for community and economic development. In

Phillips, R & RH Pittman (Eds.), An introduction to community development (pp. 3-19). New York: Routledge.

Rao, M. Govinda. Poverty Alleviation under Fiscal Decentralization.


Suhartono, E. (2005). Building People Empowering Communities: Strategic Review of Social Welfare Development and Social Work. Bandung: Refika aditama.

Sunshine, Glenn (2012). Four Principles of Poverty Alleviation.


Telford, J. (2012). Disaster Recovery: An International Humanitarian Challenge? In P. Daly, RM Feener, & A. Reid (Eds.), From The Ground Up: Perspectives on Post-Tsunami and Post-Conflict Aceh (pp. 25-39). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Telford, J., Cosgrave, J., & Houghton, R. (2006). Joint Evaluation of the International Response to the Indian Ocean Tsunami: Synthesis Report. London: Tsunami Evaluation Coalition.

Thorburn, C. (2008). Village government in Aceh, three years after the tsunami. UC Berkeley: Center for Southeast Asia Studies.

Thorburn, C., & Rochelle, B. (2014). The Acehnese Gampong Ten Years On: A Tsunami Assessment Post. Singapore: Earth Observatory of Singapore.

Rohwerder, Brigitte, 2014. The impact of conflict on poverty

World Bank. (2008). Aceh Poverty Assessment 2008: the impact of conflict, the tsunami and reconstruction on poverty in Aceh. The World Bank. Banda Aceh / Jakarta: The World Bank.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2017 Syiah Kuala University

ISSN: 2345-6789

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.