Actor role of comparative foreign presence in regional autonomy: The case of Aceh, Mindanoa and Southern Thailand

Nellis Mardhiah

Abstract


Actor role abroad is not rational actors but devotees pluralist international organizations. Foreign policy is the result of disputes, bargaining, and compromise between many different actors. Foreign policy of the recruitment process is not rational process but a social process. It is the process to change the position and the results of overseas conflicts actor was referring to the difficult issues resolved, especially involving the values ​​of life. Consultation undertaken will produce a compromise on both sides especially the things that divided equally. This study analyzes documentation from previous studies. The three issues are very complex in the approach by the respective governments have played is the same solidarities. Possible policy approaches in Aceh as a national issue from the old order to the new order did not work in peace. But with the success HDC mediators autonomous region status. Mindanao is also the case when the open dialogue supported by ASEAN through OKI mediators to achieve ARMM with the MNLF and the Philippine government bring. While in Southern Thailand is done with a variety of approaches and thus more complicated question, and the Government of Thailand Thailand is considered as a national issue in the case of the Southern Thailand Pattani political approach that uses the theory of conflict management and conflict termination will peel intention behind these approaches conflict resolution has been carried out Pattani, Narathiwat and Yala this. Through the analysis, there might be things that are not clear in the case of trying to hide this particular role played by the Thai government in addressing the issues that arise, so that the proposed autonomous region was still in the of process.

Keywords: Actor Role of Foreign Affairs, Regional Autonomy


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Ibrahim Muhammad Daud, (2008), The Secret of Jihad Moro: Fakta-Fakta Perlawanan Kaum Tertindas Moro Solo: media ISLAMIKA. P.66

Alfian. Ibrahim. (2005). Wajah Aceh dalam lintasan sejarah. Yogyakarta. Gajah mada. University Press.

Asy’ari, Ahwan Mukarrom dan Shonhaji, (2008) Pengantar Studi Islam, Surabaya: IAIN AMPEL PRESS

Dhakidae. Daneil. (2003). Cendekiawan dan Kekuasaan dalam Negara Baru. Yogyakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Danial, M. (2004). Konflik Selatan Thailand dan Transformasi Sosial. Pembentangan Kertas Kerja Sempena Minggu Perdamaian Universiti Sains Malaysia Ke-3. Pada 14 Disember 2004. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang

Erni. B, (2003) “Gerakan Pembebasan Moro dan Perjanjian Damai,” dalam multiculturalism, Separatism dan Pembentukan Negara Bangsa di Philippine, Jakarta : LIPI. P. 97-98

Erni. B, (2003), Minoritas Muslim di Filipina, Thailand dan Myanmar : Masalah Represif Politik, Jakarta : LIPI

Fisher, et. All, (2001), Mengelola Konflik : Keterampilan dan Strategi untuk Bertindak, Terjemahan, S. N, Karika Sari, Jakarta : Brintish Council

Galtung, Johan (1975). “Three Approaches to Peace: Peacekeeping, Peacemaking, and Peace building”. Dalam Johan Galtung (ed.) Peace, War, and Defence – Essays in Peace Research. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers

Ibrahim,S. H, (2002), Sejarah Kerajaan Melayu Patani. Banggi, Penerbit: Universitas Kebangsaan Malaysia. P. 74

Lukman, (2007), Peranan Masyarakat Sivil dalam Transformasi Konflik Aceh, Thesis Master, University Sains Malaysia.

Mitchell, C.R. (1981) The Structure of International Conflict. The City University, London: The Macmillan Press Ltd. P.256

Mutali, (2012), Pandangan Debar Domain Untuk Moro, Anticipating Peace For Moro, National University of Singapore, Source : P. 16

Nazaruddin Syamsudin, (1999), Revolusi di Serambi Mek kah, Jakarta: UI-Press. P 282

Nur-El Ibrahimi, (2001), Peranan Teuku Daud Beureueh dalam Pergolakan Aceh, Jakarta: Media Dakwah,. P.122

Peter, W. (1987), Understanding Conflict Resolution: A Framework, Peace Research: Achievements and Challenges. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. P. 8

Richard. Robinson. (1996). Indonesia : The Rise of Capital Syney : Alien dan Unwir

Syukri, I. (2002), Sejarah Kerajaan Melayu Patani. Bangi, Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. P. 81

Stedman.at all. (2002). Ending Civil War : The Implementation of Peace Agreement. Boulder. Lynne Rienner

Stedman, (1996), Negotiation and Mediation in Internal Conflict, dalam Micheal E. Brown, (ed) the International Dimensions of Internal Conflict, Cambridge : Mitt Press

Vayrynan. R, (1991), New Direction in Conflict Theory : Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation, London Sage Publication

Yaacob, C, M, A. (2009) Konflik Pemisah di Selatan Thailand: Isu, Aktor dan Penyelesaian. MA Tesis. Universiti Sains Malaysia

Yaacob, (2011), Isu Penyelesaian : Konflik Pemisah di Thailand, Journal of History, Politics &Srategic Studies, UKM,Vol (38). No (1) P.13

Yaacop, (2012), Asmilasi Bangsa Melayu di Patani : Keberkesanan Dasar dan Surivival Budaya Minority, Malaysian Jounal of History, Politict and Startegic Studies, UKM, Vol (39). No (11) P. 97

Yusuf, (2009), “Etnireligius and Political Dimensions of Solithern Thailand Conflict”, dalam Islam and Politics Renewel and Resistance in the Muslim World, Editor : Amid Pandya dan Ellen Laipson. Washinton.

Zulkernaen. (2006). Proses Perdamaian Aceh : Analisa Kegagalan HDC dan Keberhasilan CMI. Jurnal wawasan. Vol (12). No.(1) P.5

Zarman. (2000). Mediating Conflicts of Need Greed and Creed. Orbis. Vol (44). No (2), P. 7.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2017 Syiah Kuala University

ISSN: 2345-6789

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.