The Identification of Student Misconceptions on the Concept of Electricity Using the CRI Decision Matrix Three Level Test

Muhammad Azzarkasyi, Syamsul Rizal, Kasmawati Kasmawati

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to determine the percentage of students who experience misconceptions (MIS), know the concept (KCC), do not know the concept (LK), Guess (LG), and not confidence (NC) in learning electricity concepts; in what subconcepts students experience misconceptions and what causes misconceptions. The object of the research was the first-level D-III students of Radiology Engineering in the first semester of the 2016/2017 school year who contracted the Basic Physics course. The study was conducted in November 2016. The method used is descriptive method. In this study the CRI Three-Tier Test decision matrix is used to identify student misconceptions. Identification is done by using a structured choice diagnostic test that is equipped with an index of student confidence in the test answers and also equipped with a column of reasons from the answers given by students. To find out the cause of the misconception conducted interviews. The results of CRI diagnostic data analysis showed that of the 37 students who were the object of research it was found that as many as 26.35% did not know the concept (LK), 20.95% knew the concept (KCC) where the students were in accordance with scientific conceptions, 0.51% students guessed LG), 40.88% of students experienced misconceptions (Mis), and 11.32% of answers to students who were not confident (NC). The highest percentage of misconception was found in the sub-principle of ohm's legal concept (41.08%), kirchhoff's legal sub-concept (41.89%) and sub-basic concepts of electric and parallel circuits (40.54%). The results of the interviews showed that the causes of the misconceptions included the character of abstract electrical concepts, lack of understanding of the concept, difficulty analyzing the sequence, and the unpreparedness of students to accept material delivered by the lecturer.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Murni, D. (2013). Indentifikasi Miskonsepsi pada Konsep Substansi Genetika Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index. Prosiding Semirata FMIPA, Universitas Lampung.

Hakim, A., Liliasari., and Kadarohman, A. (2012). Student Concept Understanding of Natural Products Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolites Using the Data Collecting Technique of Modified CRI. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3): 544-553.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., and Calhoun. (2009). Models of Teaching, Eighth Edition. New York : Pearson Education, Inc.

Kocakulah, S. And Kucukozer, H. (2007). Secondary School Students’ Misconceptions about Simple Electric Circuits. Jounal of Turkish Science Education, 4(1): 1-10.

McDermott, L.C, and Shaffer. (1992). Research As A Guide For Curriculum Development: An Example From Introductory Electricity. Part I : Investigation Of Student Understanding. American Journal Of Physic, 60(11): 994-1003

Purba, J.P. dan G. Depari. (2008). Penelusuran Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa tentang Konsep dalam Rangkaian Listrik Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index dan Interview. JPTE FPTK UPI. Bandung.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep Dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/ajse.v1i1.14614

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Asian Journal of Science Education