Students’ Ways of Thinking on Geometry

Resy Nirawati, Darhim Darhim, Siti Fatimah, Dadang Juandi


Ways of Thinking (WoT) is a fundamental ability that is part of the mental act that students must learn to solve geometry problems. The purpose of this research was to describe how WoT is used to solve geometry problems. This research used the descriptive qualitative methodology with a holistic case study design and data collection techniques such as tests, interviews, observation, documentation, and triangulation. The subjects in this research were 35 fourth-grade students from Sambas Regency Public Elementary Schools, Indonesia. The research focused on three students with varying levels of cognitive abilities: low, medium, and high. The results showed that students with high, medium, and low cognitive capabilities performed mental acts with the corresponding WoT. Students with high, medium and low cognitive capabilities were more likely to work on questions that required interpretation. Besides, it also revealed that errors committed students were learning errors, reading errors, careless errors, conceptual errors, and procedure errors. The implementation of WoT on the topic of geometry can be utilized as an alternate reference for mathematics teachers when developing teaching materials for mathematics learning to increase studentss' mathematical knowledge.


ways of thinking, types of studentss errors, geometry

Full Text:



Amril, L. O., Darhim, & Juandi, D. (2020). Deaf students and mental act in mathematics problem solving. Indonesian Journal of Social Research (IJSR), 2(1), 100–110.

Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Fuentes, S. R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS Theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education (1st ed.). Springer, New York, NY.

Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. In P. Sikes (Ed.), Teacher Development. Open University Press.

Becker, J. R., & Rivera, F. (2005). Generalization strategies of beginning high school algebra studentss. In J. L. In Chick, H. L. & Vincent (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 121–128). PME.

Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (tenth). Pearson Education, Inc.

Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques (Vol. 19).

Çimer, S. O., & Ursavaş, N. (2012). Students teachers’ ways of thinking and ways of understanding digestion and the digestive system in biology. International Education Studies, 5(3), 1–14.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2010). Learning trajectories in early mathematics- Sequences of acquisition and teaching. In Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. In Research Methods in Education (Sixth). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Edo, S. I., Hartono, Y., & Putri, R. I. I. (2013). Investigating secondary school studentss’ difficulties in modeling problems PISA-model level 5 and 6. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 41–58.

Fauzi, K. M. amin, Dirgeyase, I. W., & Priyatno, A. (2019). Building learning path of mathematical creative thinking of junior studentss on geometry topics by implementing metacognitive approach. International Education Studies, 12(2), 57.

Fitroh, W. (2020). Analisis tradisi melemang dalam kajian etnomatematika dan penerapannya dalam membelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 20(2), 596.

Freankel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (Eighth). McGraw-Hill Componies, Inc.

Harel, G. (2008). DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction, Part I: Focus on proving. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(3), 487–500.

Harel, G. (2020). The DNR system as a conceptual framework for curriculum development and instruction. In & H. In R. Lesh, J. Kaput, E. (Ed.), Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hasanah, N., Mardiyana., & Sutrima. (2009). Analisis proses berpikir siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian extrovert - introvert dan gender. Jurnal Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(4), 422–435.

Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education setting. State University of New York Press.

Hunting, R. P. (1997). Clinical interview methods in mathematics education research and practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(2), 145–165.

Ikhwanudin, T., Prabawanto, S., & Wahyudin. (2019). The error pattern of studentss with mathematics learning disabilities in the inclusive school on fractions learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(3), 75–95.

Ikhwanudin, T., & Suryadi, D. (2018). How studentss with mathematics learning disabilities understands fraction: A case from the Indonesian inclusive school. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 309–326.

Irfan, F., & Andika, A. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada materi geometri di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif (KREANO), 11(1), 27–35.

Jamilah, J., Suryadi, D., & Priatna, N. (2020). Didactic transposition from scholarly knowledge of mathematics to school mathematics on sets theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3).

Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Students difficulties in solving equations from an operational and a structural perspective. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1–2), 39–55.

Jupri, Al. (2017). From geometry to algebra and vice versa: Realistic mathematics education principles for analyzing geometry tasks. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1830.

Kaminski, E. (2002). Promoting mathematical understanding: Number sense in action. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(2), 133–149.

Koichu, B., & Harel, G. (2007). Triadic interaction in clinical task-based interviews with mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(3), 349–365.

Kurniati, D., & Annizar, A. M. (2017). The analysis of studentss’ cognitive problem solving skill in solving PISA standard-based test item. In Advanced Science Letters (Vol. 23, Issue 2). American Scientific Publishers.

Lee, I., Grover, S., Martin, F., Pillai, S., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2020). Computational thinking from a disciplinary perspective: integrating computational thinking in K-12 Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 1–8.

Lim, K. H. (2006). Students’s mental acts of anticipating in solving problem involving algebraic inequalities and equations. University of California, San Diego.

Lockwood, E., & Weber, E. (2015). Ways of thinking and mathematical practices. The Mathematics Teacher, 108(6), 461–465.

Loward S. Friedman, & Miriam W. Schuctack. (2006). Kepribadian teori klasik dan riset modern. Jakarta:Erlangga.

MdYunus, A. S., Ayub, A. F. M., & Hock, T. T. (2019). Geometric thinking of Malaysian elementary school studentss. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1095–1112.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis, a methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.

Mohamed, M., & Johnny, J. (2010). Investigating number sense among studentss. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 317–324.

Nazariah, N., Marwan, M., & Abidin, Z. (2017). Intuisi siswa SMK dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika dan perbedaan gender. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 4(1), 35–52.

Ndraha, F. (2015). Proses berpikir siswa SMP mengonstruksi bukti informal geometri sebagai prosep yang direpresentasikan secara visual / simbolik. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 01(02), 91–105.

Neuenschwander, E. (2013). Qualitas and quantitas: Two ways of thinking in science. Quality and Quantity, 47(5), 2597–2615.

Nihayah, E. F. K. (2019). Analysis of mathhematical problem solving abilities review of the characteristics of students thinking. Linear: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 2549–8657.

Nolting, P. . (2002). Winning at math (fourth edition): your guide in learning mathematics trough successful study skills. Academicy Succes Pres, Inc.

Noto, M. S., Priatna, N., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). Mathematical proof: The learning obstacles of pre-service mathematics teachers on transformation geometry. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 117–125.

Nurhasanah, H., Turmudi, & Jupri, A. (2021). Karakteristik Ways of Thinking (WoT) dan Ways of Understanding (WoU) siswa berdasarkan teori Harel. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 3(1), 105–113. : 10.37058/jarme.v3i1.2449

Oaks, T., Aberdeen, T., & Psychology, E. (2013). Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(1), 69–71.

Oflaz, G., & Demircioğlu, H. (2018). Determining ways of thinking and understanding related to generalization of eighth graders. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(2), 99–112.

Owens, K. (2014). Diversifying our perspectives on mathematics about space and geometry: an ecocultural approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 941–974.

Radović, S., Marić, M., & Passey, D. (2019). Technology enhancing mathematics learning behaviours: Shifting learning goals from “producing the right answer” to “understanding how to address current and future mathematical challenges.” Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 103–126.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2011). Ethnomathematics : the cultural aspects of mathematics etnomatemática : os aspectos culturais da matemática. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 4(2), 32–54.

Sari, F. A., Marlissa, I., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). Analisis ways of thinking (WoT) dan ways of understanding (wou) pada buku teks pelajaran matematika SMP kelas vii materi bilangan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2).

Seah, R. (2015). Reasoning with geometric shapes. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 71(2), 4–11.

Steinberg, R. M., Empson, S. B., & Carpenter, T. P. (2004). Inquiry into children’s mathematical thinking as a means to teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 237–267.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wardhani, I. S. (2015). Menumbuhkan kemampuan berfikir geometri melalui pembelajaran Connected Mathematics Project (CMP). PENA SD (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Anak Sekolah Dasar), 1(1), 97–105.

Wiryoatmojo, S., Muhtarom., & Shodiqin, A. (2013). Kesalahan proses berpikir siswa kelas VII Sekolah Menengah Pertama ( SMP ) dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Prosiding SNMPM Universitas Sebelas Maret, 1, 103–2014.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 resy nira wati, Darhim Darhim, Siti Fatimah, Dadang Juandi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Didaktik Matematika

ISSN 2355 – 4185 (print) | 2548 – 8546 (online)

Published by:

Master Program of Mathematics Education incorporated with Himpunan Matematika Indonesia (Indonesian Mathematical Society/IndoMs)

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Universitas Syiah Kuala

Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111

Website : 
Email     : 

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Didaktik Matematika by Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at