Implementation of Constructivism Model to Improve Reading Ability to The Second Year Students of MAS Al Zahrah Bireuen

Ullya Zainura


The objectives of this research are to know how Constructivism Model can be implemented in Reading Comprehension, to know the students’ response toward the implementation of Constructivism Model in teaching reading ability and to identify whether the Constructivism Model can improve the students’ reading ability to the second year students of Mas Al Zahrah. The subject of this research was an English teacher who teaches at the second year students and students of XI/B in the 2016/2017 academic year. This is a kind of action research which employs qualitative method in nature. Two cycles were conducted in this research. Each of this cycle consisted of the activities namely planning the action, implementing the action, observing the action, and reflecting. The instruments used in data collection were observation, questionnaire, and test. The result showed that the implementation of Constructivism Model was successful in improving the students’ reading ability. The result of the test in cycle 1 was 66.85 and in cycle 2 was 84.25. It means that the Constructivism Model can be used to improve the students’ reading ability. In addition, the students gave positive response toward the implementation of this model in improving their reading comprehension. It can be concluded that the Constructivism Model can be used in the teaching reading and also give positive effect to the students in learning reading comprehension.


reading ability; constructivism model; classroom action research

Full Text:



Adam, M. J. (2001). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.

Arikunto, S. (2002). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Intermasa Preess.

Beale, A. M. (2013). Skimming and scanning: Two important strategies for speeding up your reading. Retrieved from https ://www. Howtolearn .com/ 2013/02/ skimming-and-scanning-two-important-strategies-for-speeding-up-your-reading/.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. Fourth Edition. Longman, San Francisco state University.

Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching. Eanglewood Cliff, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Dody, A., & Sugeng, A. (2004). Developing English competencies for senior high school. Jakarta: Pusat Pembukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Glassersfeld, E. V. (1989). Constructivism in education. Retrieved from constructivism /EvG/.

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning. California: Corwin Press Inc. Thousand Darks.

Johnson, P. (1982). Effect on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 503-516.

Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructivism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1998). The action research planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

Linse, C. T. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Young Learners. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.

McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Masidjo. (1995). Penilaian pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di sekolah. Yogjakarta: Kanisius.

Nurhadi, & Agus, G. S. (2003). Kontektual dan penerapan dalam KBK. Malang: State Univesity of Malang.

Patel, M. F., & Jain, P. M. (2008). English language teaching: Methods, tools & techniques. Jaipur: Sunrise Publishers.

Seyler, D. U. (2004). The reading context: Developing college reading skill. New York: Pearson Longman.

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Arlington: RAND.

Sudarwati, T. M., & Grace, E. (2007). Look ahead 2 an English course for senior high school students year XI. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sudjana, N., & Kusumah, A. (2002). Proposal penelitian perguruan tinggi. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiono. (2007). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R & D. Jakarta: CV Alfabeta.

Sugiono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Wallace, C. (1992). Language teaching: A schema for teaching education. New York: Oxford University.

Zare, P. (2012). Language learning strategies among EFL/ESL learners: A review of literature. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 162-169.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

E-ISSN: 2085-3750 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.