A survey of students’ English proficiency and their needs toward learning outcomes at vocational colleges

Anhar Anhar, Sofyan A. Gani, Asnawi Muslem

Abstract


This research was conducted to investigate students’ English proficiency and their needs toward English learning outcomes. This research was based on a qualitative research design. The data were collected from 80 students who received an English proficiency test and eight students who participated in an interview session. The interview dealt with their needs and problems in communication skills in English. The result shows that there was no student who got excellent English proficiency level, eight students (10%) reached good category, 46 students (58%) achieved satisfactory category, 21 students (26%) were in poor category, and five students (6%) were in very poor category. In addition, all students need English for communication in their future profession. Finally, the results of the interview also show that industrial engineering students preparing to work in manufacturing various marble products face a serious problem in marketing their products to the consumers. In addition, the students majoring in tourism destination area considered that they have to communicate in English to support their job in providing services to tourists speaking different languages. Therefore, it can be concluded that vocational school students need transactional English in a specific field because they are being prepared to work in enterprises or to be entrepreneurs.


Keywords


polytechnic; proficiency test; students’ need; vocational college

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bahar, H. (2013). Pengembangan pembelajaran terpadu dalam pendidikan karakter [Designing integrated learning with character education]. Jurnal Teknodik, 17(2), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v0i0.80

Blanchard, K. & Root, C. (2003). Ready to write: A first composition text (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Burns, M. K., Tucker, J. A., Hauser, A., Thelen, R. L., Holmes, K. J., & White, K. (2002). Minimum reading fluency rate necessary for comprehension: A potential criterion for curriculum-based assessments. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(1), 1-7. doi:10.1177/073724770202800101

Kunasaraphan, K. (2015). English learning strategy and proficiency level of the first-year students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1853-1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.246

Langan, J. (2000). College writing skills with readings. New York: McGraw- Hill Education.

Mahbub, M. A. (2018). English teaching in vocational high school: A need analysis. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 5(2), 229-258.

Nunan, D. (2003). Teaching English as International Language. London: Macmillan Publisher.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2009). Writing academic English (4th ed.). New York: Pearson ESL.

Panyawong-Ngam, L., Tangthong, N., & Anunvrapong, P. (2015). A model to develop the English proficiency of engineering students at Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok, Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 77-82. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.012

Sert, O. (2006). Semiotic approach and its contributions to English language learning and teaching. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 31, 106-114.

Stephen, D. S., Welman, J. C., & Jordaan, W. J. (2004). English language proficiency as an indicator of academic performance at a tertiary institution. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 2(3), 42- 53.

Webb, S. (2007). The Effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml048

Zhang, S., & Duke, N. K. (2008). Strategies for internet reading with different reading purposes: A descriptive study of twelve good internet readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(1), 128-162. doi:10.1080/10862960802070491




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v12i4.19493

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

E-ISSN: 2085-3750 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.