Teaching Reading with Authentic Texts about Computers Using the Bottom Up Strategy

Mauloeddin Afna

Abstract


This experimental research was aimed at finding out whether there was a significant difference in the achievements of students who were taught through the Bottom Up Strategy (BUS) for teaching reading comprehension using authentic texts about computers and those who were taught through the conventional way (i.e. teacher-centered). The reading comprehension was built up from three inputs: comprehension, meaning construction, and understanding of technical terms. The study relied on a decoding process of outlining the paragraph into a line of idea organization. The decoding process is easily applicable because authentic texts about computer features and computer applications were used in the teaching process. The Department of Information Technology of the Aceh Polytechnic, Banda Aceh, a vocational training institute with majors in computer information systems, was selected as  the research location  for this  study. After 10 meetings or treatments, the t-score of the experimental class (EC) was 13.76 while the t-score of the control class (CC) was 12.48. The value of t-table at a level of significance (α) 0.05 was 1.70 (t (0.95) (30) = 1.70), Thus there was a significant difference between EC and CC in their reading comprehension achievements. By comparison of scores via 13.76 > 12.48, it is concluded that there was a significant difference in the achievements between the two classes, thus, Ha is proved to be accepted  for this study, that is using BUS for teaching reading comprehension using authentic texts about computers is more effective.


Keywords


Bottom Up Strategy; Decoding; Authentic Texts; Computers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading Development in a Second Language: Theoretical, Empirical and Classroom Perspectives. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Block, E. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 319-343.

Djouadi,Y., & Souam, F. (2007). Bottom up text mining through hierarchical document representation. International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 1(11), 3614-3619.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2002). Reading for academic purposes: Guidelines for the ESL/EFL teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (ed.), Methods in Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 187-204). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Grellet, F. (1981). Developing Reading Skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, W. Y. (1995). Authenticity revisited: Text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal, 49, 323–328.

Lee, C. (2009). Studies on reading strategies and teaching literary works: Interactive model in reader’s theater. Da-Yeh University General Education Journal, (3), 181-191.

Lieungnapar, A., & Todd, R. W. (2011). Top-down versus bottom-up approaches toward move analysis in ESP. Proceedings of the International Conference on Doing Research in Applied Linguistics, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 21–22 April 2011, pp. 1–10.

Little, D., Devitt, S., & Singleton, D. (1989). Learning Foreign Languages from Authentic Texts: Theory and Practice. Dublin: Authentik.

Meyer, P. (2010). On Rereading. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Pearsall, J. E. (1998). The New Oxford Dictionary of English. London: Oxford University Press.

Sudjana. (2001). Metoda Statistika, edisi ke-6. Bandung:Tarsito.

Sugiono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Welbourn, M. (1993). Approaching Authentic Texts in the Second Language Classroom: Some Factors to Consider. Master’s thesis. Malmö, Sweden: Malmö University.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




E-ISSN: 2085-3750 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.