Teaching speaking using the Information Gap technique

Dewi Sartika


This study was aimed at finding out if there would be a significant difference in achievement between students who were taught speaking using the Information Gap technique and those who were taught speaking by conventional methods, and finding out which speaking sub skills would be most improved by using the Information Gap technique with eighth grade students at Islamic boarding school SMP IT Daruzzahidin, Aceh Besar. It employed a true experimental design in which there were two classes; one the experimental group (EG) and the other the control group (CG) that each had 30 students. The data was collected through quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative data was obtained from the results of the pre-tests and post-tests of the students’ speaking. The qualitative data was obtained from the results of the students’ speaking proficiency improvement. The results of the quantitative data showed that the mean of the post-test scores of the experimental group was 82 while the mean of the post-test scores of the control group was 70. T-test result of the t-test was 4.68 while the results showed that the students taught by using the information gap technique achieved significantly better performances than those who were taught speaking by using the conventional method. Meanwhile, the data analysis from the students’ speaking proficiency showed that the students’ speaking proficiency had improved by more than 20% for all five aspects: pronunciation, grammar, lexical, speaker’s intentions, and general meaning.  Thus it was shown that the experimental group achieved a significant improvement in their speaking proficiency.


Speaking; Information Gap Technique

Full Text:



Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.

Brown, H. D. (1994). Language assessments principles and classroom practice. New York: Longman.

Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1997). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.

Depdiknas. (2004). Standard kompetency mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMP [Standard of competence for English in Junior High Schools]. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Harmer, J. (2004). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston: Newbury House.

Hornby, A. S. (1995). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary (5th Ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

Lado, R. (1964). Language teachin: A scientific approach. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill.

Neu, H., & Reeser, T. W. (1997). Parle-moiunpeu!: Information Gap activities for beginning French classes. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Richards, J. C., Platt, J. T., & Platt, H. K. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Essex: Longman.

Sudjana. (1992). Metode statistika (Edisi ke-5). Bandung: Tarsito.

Sudjana. (2002). Metoda statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.

Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

E-ISSN: 2085-3750 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.