An examination of the washback effect on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension: Any implications for text difficulty in the classroom?

shabnam kurosh khanshan

Abstract


In order to better understand the mechanisms of washback, the present study aimed to explore the washback effect of the entrance examination in Iran on language learners’ achievement in reading comprehension. The purpose of this study was also to examine ways in which the washback effect could modulate the selection of reading texts in the classroom, their difficulty level, and their effectiveness from the perspective of test takers. A total of 48 state and private university students studying English language teaching (ELT) at the MA level took part in this study. Participants were asked to provide answers to a researcher-developed questionnaire as well as to open-ended questions. The results of data analysis revealed that the entrance exam had a positive washback on learners’ reading comprehension in a number of ways. Furthermore, it was found that textbooks with a moderate level of difficulty were perceived as more effective by test takers. Implications for policymakers and suggestions for further research are presented.


Keywords


washback; assessment; reading comprehension; text difficulty; entrance exam

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alderson, J. C. (2004). Forward. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research context and methods (pp. ix-xii). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115-129.

Andrews, S. (2004). Washback and curriculum innovation. In L. Cheng, & Y. Watanabe with A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing (pp. 37-50). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257-279.

Biggs, J. (1995). Assumptions underlying new approaches to educational assessment: Implications for Hong Kong. Curriculum Forum, 4(2), 1-22.

Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Successful students’ formative and summative uses of assessment. Assessment in Education, 8(2), 153-169.

Brown, A. V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 46-60

Campbell, J., & Collins, D. (2007). Student involved classroom assessment (3rd ed.). Columbus: Merrill Publishing.

Chapman, D. W., & Snyder, C. W. (2000). Can high stakes national testing improve instruction: reexamining conventional wisdom. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(6), 457-479.

Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11(1), 38-54.

Cheng, L. (1998). Impact of a public English examination change on students' perceptions and attitudes toward their English learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24(3), 279-301.

Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, & Y. Watanabe with A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Cooper, D. J. (1986). Improving reading comprehension. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 137–151.

Elder, C., & Wigglesworth, G. (1996). Perspectives on the testing cycle: Setting the scene. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S(13), 1-12.

Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Ghorbani, M. R., Samad, A. A., Hamzah, M. S. G., & Nooreen, N. (2008). The washback effect of the Iranian university entrance examination on pre-University English teachers. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 5(3), 1-29.

Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Studies in language testing (Volume 25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (1998). Ethical test preparation practice: The case of TOEFL. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 329-337.

Hare, V. C. (1981). Readers' problem identification and problem-solving strategies for high and low knowledge comprehenders. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 359-365.

Hayes, B., & Read, J. (2004). IELTS Test Preparation in New Zealand: Preparing Students for the IELTS Academic Module. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in Language Testing (pp. 97-111). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hughes, A. (1993). Backwash and TOEFL 2000. Reading, U.K.: University of Reading.

Khezrlou, S. (2012a). The relationship between cognitive and metacognitive strategies, age and level of education. The Reading Matrix, 12(1), 50-61.

Khezrlou, S. (2012b). Cognitive strategy training: Improving reading comprehension in the language classroom. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(4), 77-98.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and he genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maclellan, E. (2004). Initial knowledge states about assessment: Novice teachers’ conceptualizations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 523-535.

McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mehrens, W. A., & Kaminski, J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test scores: Fruitful, fruitless, or fraudulent. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 8(1), 14-22.

Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241-256.

Nazari, M., & Nikoopour, J. (2011). The wash back effect of high school examinations on Iranian EFL learners' language learning beliefs. Journal of Language Translation, 2(1), 29-49.

Nikoopour, J., Amini Farsani, M., & Nasiri, M. (2011). On the relationship between critical thinking and language learning strategies among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Technology & Education, 5(3), 195-200.

Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. II. (1981). Comprehension monitoring memory and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13(1), 5-22.

Pearson, I. (1988). Tests as levers for change. In D. Chamberlain & R. J. Baumgardner (Eds.), ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation (pp. 98-107). London: Modern English.

Popham, W. J. (1987). The merits of measurement-driven instruction. Phi Delta Kappa, 68, 679-682.

Popham, W. J. (1993). Measurement-driven instruction as a "quick-fix" reform strategy. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26(1), 31-34.

Popham, W. J. (2010). Demystifying the tools that shape our schools. Pearson.

Qi, L. (2005). Stakeholders' conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test. Language Testing, 22(2), 142-173.

Qi, L. (2007). Is testing an efficient agent for pedagogical change? Examining the intended washback of the writing task in a high-stakes English test in China. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(1), 51-74.

Ramezaney, M. (2014). The washback effect of university entrance exam on Iranian EFL teachers’ curricular planning and instruction techniques. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1508-1517.

Raphael, T. E., Myers, A. C., Tirre, W. C., Fritz, M., & Freebody, P. (1981). The effects of some known sources of difficulty on meta-comprehension and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 324-334.

Rezvani, R., & Sayyadi, A. (2016). Washback effects of the new Iranian TEFL Ph.D. program entrance exam on EFL instructors' teaching methodology, class assessment, and syllabus design. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(5), 1111, 2016.

Shih, C. M. (2007). A new washback model of students' learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 135-162.

Shohamy, E. (1993). The power of test: The impact of language testing on teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.

Shohamy, E. (2007). The power of language tests, the power of the English language and the role of ELT. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of language teaching (pp. 521-532). New York: Springer.

Spolsky, B. (1994). The examination-classroom backwash cycle: Some historical cases. In D. Nunan, R. Berry & V. Berry (Eds.), Bringing about change in language education: Proceedings of the International Language in Education Conference 1994 (pp. 55-66). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In B. Gauvain & F. Cole (Eds) Readings on the development of children (pp. 34-40). New York: Scientific American Books.

Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In C. Clapman & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of language and education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (pp. 291-302). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Watanabe, Y. (1996). Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research. Language Testing, 13(3), 318-333.

Weaver III, C. A., & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory and Cognition, 23(1), 12-22.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/ijolta.v1i2.10624

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Language Testing and Assessment

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2018 Language Center of Syiah Kuala University

ISSN: 2622-3309 (online)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.