The effects of dynamic assessment and gender on EFL learners' oral narrative task performance

Leila Ahmadpour, Hassan Asadollahfam


The present study is an endeavor to explore the potential of dynamic assessment (DA) as a way of scaffolding English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ oral production. Although the literature on dynamic assessment is rich with studies focused on language components and skills such as vocabulary, reading, and writing, very few studies have attempted to examine the role of dynamic assessment in fostering real-time oral production. It is assumed that assessment of learners’ oral production need not focus solely on evaluation; rather, learners need to determine their weaknesses and try to compensate for them with the help of a more knowledgeable peer. Therefore, the present study also focused on evaluating the role of DA in Iranian EFL learners’ oral narrative task performances in the classroom. Furthermore, an attempt was made to explore the role of gender in the production of mediated narratives. For this purpose, a total of 60 students from two private universities were assigned to two intact classes: One class served as the experimental group, which was exposed to teachers’ mediation in learners’ narrative productions, and the other group functioned as the control group and received no such mediation for their oral narrative language production. The overall speech quality of learners’ production from each narrative over the treatment period provided the required data. The results were analyzed through independent samples t-tests, which revealed significant effects of both group and gender differences. The experimental learners, as expected, were able to progress and cultivate their oral production abilities after having been exposed to DA. Regarding gender, male participants were more successful in terms of enhanced second language oral production. The study has significant implications for the integration of DA into learners’ oral production, suggesting that EFL narrative production is a skill that is highly anxiety-provoking for learners.


grammar; dynamic assessment; scaffolding; oral narrative tasks; gender

Full Text:



Abrams, R. A. (1993). Narrative competence and storytelling performance: How children tell stories in different contexts. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(4), 285-313.

Ableeva R. (2007). Assessing listening for development. In R. Alana and S. Payphone (Eds.), Language in Action: Vygotsky and Leontievian legacy today (pp. 352- 379). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Ableeva, R. (2008). The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension. In P Lantolf & ME Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 57–86). London: Equinox.

Ableeva, R, & Lantolf, JP. (2011). Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension. Assessment in Education, 18, 133–149.

Alavi, S. M., & Taghizadeh, M. (2014). Dynamic assessment of writing: The impact of implicit/explicit mediations on L2 learners' internalization of writing skills and strategies. Educational Assessment, 19(1), 1-16.

Baek, S-G., & Kim, K. J. (2003). The effect of dynamic based assessment instruction on children’s learning. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 189-198.

Berman, R. A. (1995). Narrative competence and storytelling performance: How children tell stories in different contexts. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(4), 285-313.

Boudreau, D. (2008). Narrative Abilities Advances in Research and Implication for Clinical Practice. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(2), 99-114.

Boyle, J. P. (1987). Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning, 37(2), 273-284.

Burstall, C. (1975). Factors affecting foreign-language learning: consideration of some relevant research findings. Teaching and Linguistic Abstract, 8, 5-125.

Budoff, M., & Friedman, M. (1964). “Learning potential” as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 434–439.

Burnur, D. (1988). A guide to reading narratives of conflict choice for self and voice. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

Celinska, D. K. (2004). Personal narratives of students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19(2), 83-98.

Cenoz, J. (2001). The effect of linguistic distance, L2 status and age on cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, and U. Jessner (eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third anguage acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 8–20). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Curenton, S., & Justice, L. (2004). African American and preschoolers’ use of decontextualized language: Literate language features in oral narratives. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 240-253.

Elliot, J. (2003). Dynamic Assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educational Review, 55(1), 15–32.

Fiestas, C., & Peña, E. (2004). Narrative discourse in bilingual children: Language and task effects. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 155-168.

Fleer, M. (2002). Sociocultural theory: rebuilding the theoretical foundations of early childhood education. Delta: Policy and Practice in Education, 54(1 & 2), 105119.

Frisby, C. L., & Braden, J. P. (1992). Feuerstein’s dynamic assessment approach: A semantic, logical and empirical critique. Journal of Special Education, 26, 281–301.

Fulcher, G. (1996). Testing tasks: Issues in task design and the group oral. Language Testing, 13(1), 23–51.

Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gazella, J., & Stockman, I. J. (2003). Children’s story retelling under different modality and task conditions: Implications for standardizing language sampling procedures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 61-72.

Gee, J.P. (1991). A linguistic approach to narrative. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 15- 39

Georgakopoulou A., Goustsos D. (1997). Discourse analysis: an introduction. Edinburgh. University Press.

Gergen, K., & Gergen, M. (1986). Narrative form and the construction of psychological science. In T. Sarbin (Ed.) Narrative psychology (pp. 22-44). New York: Praeger.

Hashemnezhad, H. & Fatollahzadeh, F. (2015).The immediate and elayed effect of dynamic assessment on the improvement of Iranian EFLlearners’ writing performance. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(2), 193-209.

Heaton, J. (1997). Beginning composition through pictures. Harlow: Longman.

Jorgensen, M., & Togher, L. (2009). Narrative after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of monologic and jointly-produced discourse. Brain Injury, 23(9), 727-740

Johnstone, R. (2001). Children’s story retelling and comprehension using a new narrative resource. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 8(1/2), 91-113.

Juqueira, C. (2010). The role of syntax in encoding and recall of pictorial narratives: Evidence from specific language impairment. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 25-46.

Karabinar, S. (2012). The attitudes of EFL teachers towards teaching culture and their classroom practices. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 113-126.

Kellerman, E. (2001) New uses for old language: Cross-linguistic and cross-gestural influence in the narratives of non-native speakers. In

J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, and U. Jessner (eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 170 –91). Clevedon, UK:Multilingual Matters.

Khezrlou, S. (2012). The relationship between cognitive and metacognitive strategies, age and level of education. The Reading Matrix, 12(1), 50-61.

Khezrlou, S. (2018). Form-focused instruction in CALL: What do learners think? RELC, 1-17.

Khezrlou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted glosses on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension in three learning conditions. System, 65, 104-116.

Klecan-Aker, J., & Colson, K. (2009). Criterion-Referenced Assessment for Language Organization: An example of evidence-based practice. Forum on Public Policy, 4, 1-11.

Klecan-Aker, J., & Gill, C. (2005). Teaching language organization to a child with pervasive developmental disorder: A case study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21(1), 60-74.

Kozulin, A, & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127.

Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 395-415.

Lantolf, J. P. (2009). Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment. Language Teaching, 42(3), 355–368.

Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 49-72.

Leung, C. (2007). Dynamic Assessment: Assessment for and as teaching? Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(3), 257–278.

Le, K., Coelho, C., Mazeiko, J., & Grafman, J. (2011). Measuring goodness of story narratives. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 118-126.

Lidz, CS. (2002). Mediated learning experiences (MLE) as a basis for an alternative approach to assessment. School Psychology International, 23(1), 68–84.

Lidz, C. S. (2009). Dynamic Assessment, progress, problems, and prospects: A commentary on Karpov and Tzuriel. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(3), 238–241.

Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Bou-Franch, P. (2003). Gender and politeness: Spanish and British undergraduates’ perceptions of appropriate requests. In Género, lenguaje y traducción , ed. José Santaemilia, (pp. 187-199). Valencia: Universitat de Valencia/Dirección General de la Mujer.

McCabe, A., & Bliss, L. (2003). Patterns of narrative discourse A multicultural, lifespan approach. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

McKinnie, M., & Priestly, T. (2004). Telling tales out of school: Assessing linguistic competence in minority language fieldwork. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25(1), 24 –40.

McNamara, T. (2004). Language testing. In A. Davies& C.Elder (Eds), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 763- 783). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Nicolopoulou, A. (1997). Children and narratives: Toward an interpretive and sociocultural approach. In M. Bamberg (Ed.), Narrative development, six approaches (pp. 179-215). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Okamoto, S. (2002). Ideology and social meanings: Rethinking the relationship between language, politeness, and gender. In S. Benor et al. (eds.), Gendered practices in language (pp. 91-113). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Pearson, B. (2002). Narrative competence among monolingual and bilingual school children in Miami. In D. Kimbrough Oller & R. Eilers (eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 135-74). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment. A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. New York, NY: Springer.

Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic Assessment: Fairness through the prism of mediation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 99–112.

Poehner, ME, & van Compernolle, RA. (2011). Frames of interaction in Dynamic Assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(2), 183–198.

Ramezanpour, G., Nourdad, N., & Nouri, N. (2016). Gender differences in the effect of dynamic assessment on the grammatical accuracy of writings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 90-96. Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16, 164–189.

Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice building on each other. In E. Amsel & K. A. Renninger(Eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reilly, J., Losh, M., Bellugi, U., Wulfeck, B., (2004). Frog, where are you?: Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury and Williams syndrome. Brain and Language, 88, 229–247.

Schneider, P., Hayward, D., & Vis Dubé, R. (2006). Storytelling from pictures using the Edmonton narrative norms instrument. Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 30(4), 224.

Stadler, M., & Ward, G. (2010). The effect of props on story retells in the classrooms. Reading Horizons, 50(3), 169-192.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18(3), 275–282.

Tannen, D. (1993). What’s in a frame?: Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 14-56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Toth, P. D. (2011). Teacher- and learner-led discourse in task-based grammar instruction: Providing procedural assistance for morphosyntactic development. Language Learning, 61(1), 141-188.

Tzuriel, D. (2011). Revealing the effects of cognitive education programs through Dynamic Assessment, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice (Vol. 18, pp. 113–131).

Ukrainetz, T., & Gillam, R. (2009). The expressive elaboration of imaginative narratives by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 883-898.

Van der Veen, C., & Poland, M. (2012). Dynamic Assessment of narrative competence. In B. van Oers (Ed.), Developmental Education for young children: Concept, practice, and implementation (pp. 105–119). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The problem of age. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Child Psychology. New York: Plenum.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Language Testing and Assessment

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2018 Language Center of Syiah Kuala University

ISSN: 2622-3309 (online)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.