The Board Composition as an Explanatory Factor of the Capital Structure of Mexican Listed Companies

Martha Luisa Puente Esparza, Guadalupe del Carmen Briano-Turrent, Luis Ángel García-Estrada

Abstract


Objective – The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of the composition of the BD on the leverage level in companies listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange (MSE) in the materials and industrial sectors during the 2009-2013 period. Particularly, we study four dimensions of the board: size, independence, female presence and the COB-CEO duality.

Design/methodology – This study focused on the materials and industrial comprising about 50% of all listed companies on the Mexican Stock Exchange. The sample consists of 48 companies and 207 year-observations corresponding to the 2009-2013 period. Using a multiple regression analysis. This study is a pioneer in analyzing these variables in Mexico, since previous literature has focused on developed and Anglo-Saxon countries.

Results – The results show that size and independence of the board affect the leverage level. In addition, certain business characteristics such as the industrial sector, the company’s age, profitability and size influence the leverage level in Mexican listed companies. The results provide practical evidence for those responsible for issuing policies and principles of corporate governance as well as for the companies under analysis.

Research limitations – There are several limitations in this study. In the first place, only two sectors of the companies listed in Mexico during the 2009-2013 period were analyzed. On the other hand, linear regression analysis was used, which does not solve the problems of causality between variables, however we did not count with enough observations. However, despite the limitations mentioned, the results are interesting in the case of Mexico. In addition, this study can be extended in the future for other sectors and extend the period of analysis, as well as include other Latin American countries to carry out comparative studies.

Keywords Board of Directors, Leverage, Corporate Governance, Mexico


Full Text:

PDF

References


ACAD. (2012). Counselors of Advice and High Direction. Or held by Council Advisors and Senior Management: http://www.acad-mx.com/publicaciones/Responsabilidades%20de%20los%20Miembros%20del%20Consejo%20de%20Administraci%C3%B3n.pdf

Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York.

Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 25-40.

Briano Turrent, G.C, Arg. Linares, E., & Rodriguez Ariza, L. (2011). The Regulation on Corporate Governance in Latin America and Spain. XIV meeting AECA. 1-19.

Burke, RJ (1997). Women directors: selection, acceptance and benefits of board membership. Corporate Governance, 5 (3), 118-125.

Cai, CX, Keasey, K., & Short, H. (2006). Corporate governance and information efficiency in security markets. European Financial Management, 12 (5), 763-787.

Castrillo Lara, L. Á., & San Martin Reyna, JM (2007). The family property as a mechanism of government disciplining the management in companies. Journal of Accounting and Administration (222), 59-82.

CCE. (2010). Code of Best Corporate Practices. Obtained from Code of Best Corporate Practices: http://www.cce.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/CMPC.pdf

Bradley, M. and Chen, D. (2015 ). Does Board Independence Reduce the Cost of Debt? Financial Management, 44 (1), 15-47.

Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economics, 4 (16), 386-405.

Fatma, T., & Dufour, D. (2005). One analyze the présence d'administrateurs indépendants au sein du conseil d'administration: contrôle ou conseil. Center de Recherche en Ingénierie Financière et Finances publiques (CRIFP) .

Gandía, J.L. (2008). Determinants of interest-based corporate governance disclosure by English companies. Online Information Review, 32 (6), 791-817.

Garay, U., & González, M. (2008). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Case of Venezuela. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 (3), 194-210.

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305-360.

John, T., & John, K. (1993). Top-management compensation and capital structure. J Finance, 48 , 949-974.

Kothari, S. (2009). The effect of disclosures by management, analysts, and business press on cost of capital, return volatility, and analyst forecasts: A study using content analysis. The Accounting Review, 84 (5), 1639-1670.

La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanés, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). 'Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (3), 3-27.

OECD. (2004, APRIL 16). Principles of Corporate Governance. Retrieved from Principles of Corporate Governance: http://www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/31557724.pdf

Palacín Sanchez , MJ (1997). The Market of Control of Companies: Caso Español . Retrieved from The Market of Companies Control: Spanish Case: file: /// C: / Users / Teacher / Downloads / Dialnet-

LaPoliticaDeDividendosEnLasEmpresasDelIBEX35-2519594% 20 (2) .pdf

Peng, M. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management, 28 (2), 275-296.

Pindado, J., & De la Torre, C. (2006). The Role of Financing, Investment and Dividend Decisions in Explaining Corporate Ownership Structure: Evidence from Spain. European Financial Management, 12 (5), 661-687.

Pratt, J. W., & Zeckhauser, RJ (1991). Principals and agents: The structure of business . Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

Puentes-Poyatos, R., Velasco-Gámez, M., & Vilar- Hernández, J. (2010). Good Corporate Governance in Cooperative Societies. Mexico DF

Rutherford, M. (2001). Institutional economics: Then and now. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (3), 173-194.

Samaha, K., Da hawy, K., Hussainey, K., & Stapleton, P. (2012). The extent of corporate governance disclosure and its determinants in a developing market: The case of Egypt. Advances in Accounting, 28 (1), 168-178.

Veblen, T. (1914). The instinct of workmanship and the state of the industrial arts . New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

Vintilá Ph D, G. (2013). Study on CEO Duality and Corporate Governance of Companies Listed in Bucharest Stock Exchange. Magazine 88 Română de Statistică - Supliment Trim II / 2013 , 1-6.

Wang, C.J. (2012 ). Board size and firm risk-taking. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 38 (4), 519-542 .

Zambrano Vargas, S.M., & Acuña Corredor, G.A. (2011). Capital Structure. Theoretical Evolution. Free Criterion, 9 (15), 81-102.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v1i1.11084

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by:

Accounting Department
Economics and Business Faculty
Syiah Kuala University
Kopelma Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
E-ISSN: 2621-1041

 

Creative Commons License
Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics by Accounting Department of Economics and Business Faculty of Syiah Kuala University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JAROE/index.