Factors Affecting Performance in Companies with High Agency Costs

Linda Risyad Linda


Objective – This research focuses on manufacturing companies with high growth rates, as measured by the Tobins'Q proxy. The high growth of a company is closely related to higher agency costs, compared to companies with low growth rates. We investigate the influence of the board of commissioners, directors, audit committees, bid-ask spreads on the high agency costs of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The indicator of agency costs in this study are the EXPR and AUR ratios.


Design/methodology – The population of this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Purposive random sampling resulted 111 samples of companies with high growth rates. This study uses multiple linear regression analysis. The first analysis with EXPR independent variable and the second analysis with AUR independent variable, both variables could be used as agency cost indicators.


Results – The result reveals that the board of commissioners and directors have a positive effect on the agency costs, which are measured by the EXPR and AUR ratios while the audit committee has a negative significant effect on the high agency costs as measured by the EXPR ratio. Moreover, bid-ask spread as a control variable has a significant positive effect on AUR. The presence of monitoring quality, pressure, reputation of the board of commissioners and audit committee will reduce the types of management policy which may increase agency conflict.


Agency Costs; Board of Commissioners; Directors; Audit Committees; Bid-Ask Spreads

Full Text:



Ade, Y. (2007). Hubungan struktur kepemilikan dan external monitoring terhadap agency cost dan aliran kas. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 12(3), 343–354.

Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377–397.

Ahmed, K., & Courtis, J. K. (1999). Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: A meta-analysis. The British Accounting Review, 31(1), 35–61.

Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, 55, 81–106.

Attig, N., Gadhoum, Y., & Lang, H. P. L. (2002). Bid-ask spread, asymmetric information and ultimate ownership. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/0.2139/ssrn.332020

Bhagat, S., Brickley, J. A., & Coles, J. L. (1987). Managerial indemnification and liability insurance: The effect on shareholder wealth. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 54, 721–736.

Coles, J., & Hoi, C. (2003). New evidence on the market for directors: Board membership and Pennsylvania senate bill 1310 LVIII. Journal of Finance, 197–230.

Dahya, J., McConnell, J., & Travlos, N. (2002). The cadbury committee, corporate performance and top-management turnover. Journal of Finance, 57, 461–483.

Denis, D. (2001). Twenty–five years of corporate governance research and accounting. Review of Financial Economics, 10, 191–212.

Denis, D., & Connell, J. M. (2003). International corporate governance. In ECGI Working Paper5. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/search?q=Denis%2C+D.%2C+and+M.Connell+J.+(2003).+International+corporate+governance.+ECGI.+Working+Paper+5&oq=Denis%2C+D.%2C+and+M.Connell+J.+(2003).+International+corporate+governance.+ECGI.+Working+Paper+5&aqs=chrome..69i57.2166j0

Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary dislosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, 325–345.

Fadah, I. (2010). Faktor penentu dividen dan biaya keagenan serta pengaruhnya pada nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 14(3), 391–406.

Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 715–732.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.

Florackis, C., & Ozkan, A. (2004). Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence for UK firms. European Finance Association Meetings.

Gisbert, A., & Navalla, B. (2013). The association between voluntary disclosure and corporae governance in the presence of severe agency conflicts. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 29, 286–298.

Henry, D. (2010). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance compliance: A private contracting perspective. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18, 24–46.

Hunziker, S. (2013). Internal control disclosure and agency cost-evidence from Swiss listed non financial companies. In Working Paper. University of Applied Sciences, Grafenauweg.

Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323–339.

Jensen, M. (1993). The modem industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305– 360.

Kementrian Keuangan. (2012). Keputusan ketua badan pengawas pasar modal dan lembaga keuangan nomor: KEP-643/BL/2012. Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal Dan Lembaga Keuangan, 1–8.

McKnight, P. J., & Weir, C. (2009). Agency cost, corporate governance mechanisme and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis. The Quartely Review of Economics and Finance, 49, 139–158.

Miller, D., & Breton, L. I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Businesses Review, 29(1).

Pantaliz, C., & Park, C. (2013). Agency costs and equity mispricing. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 43, 89–123.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-undang republik indonesia nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang perseroan terbatas. , (2007).

Ronen, J., & Yaari, V. (2008). Earnings management: Emerging insights in theory, practice, and research. Springer Science & Business Media.

Welker, M. (1995). Disclosure policy, information asymmetry, and liquidity in equity markets. Spring, 11(2), 801–827. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00467.x

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v3i1.16430


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Published by:

Accounting Department
Economics and Business Faculty
Syiah Kuala University
Kopelma Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
E-ISSN: 2621-1041


Creative Commons License
Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics by Accounting Department of Economics and Business Faculty of Syiah Kuala University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JAROE/index.