Learning Observation: The Demands of 21st Century Biology Learning in Senior High School

Anda Juanda*, Aisha Nur Maulida, Ria Yulia Gloria, Dindin Nasrudin

Abstract


The sophistication of technology and access to information in the twenty-first century pushed education providers to transform preparing students to face a more challenging future. Effective and relevant teaching and learning strategies are needed in biology learning to meet the needs of future generations. Therefore, this study aims to observe the biology learning process in one of senior high school. A qualitative research approach with an observation method was used in this study. This research was conducted in class X SMA N 1 Tanjung, Brebes, Central Java. Data collection techniques used in this study are observation check list, questionnaires, and interviews. Observation of the biology learning process carried out focused on the lesson plan document, learning process, and interviews as well as student and teacher questionnaires on the biology learning process. The data collection process was carried out 3 times. The results obtained from this study indicate that teachers already know the demands of the curriculum and the needs of the 21st century. This can be seen from the of lesson plans made by the teacher. However, other findings from this study are, the skills of teachers in implementing the lesson plan with discovery learning methods are still not optimal. Learning activities undertaken have not yet led to the provision of student skills needed in 21st century. This research is expected to be used as a reference for improving the process of learning biology

Keywords


Biology learning process, 21st century teaching and learning, Observation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ada, M.B. 2018. Using design-based research to develop a mobile learning framework for assessment feedback. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0070-3

Aikenhead, G. 2018. Research into STS science education. Educación Química, 16(3):384-397. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2005.3.66101

Astuti, E. & Nurcahyo, H. 2019. Development of biology learning media based on adobe flash to increase interest and conceptual understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012050

Aulia, E.V., Poedjiastoeti, S., & Agustini, R. 2018. The effectiveness of guided inquiry-based student worksheets on students’ generic science skills. J Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012106

Aydin-Gunbatar, S., Tarkin-Celikkiran, A., Kutucu, E.S., & Ekiz-Kiran, B. 2018. The influence of a design-based elective STEM course on pre-service chemistry teachers’ content knowledge, STEM conceptions, and engineering views. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3):954–972. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00128f

Ayyildiz, Y. & Tarhan, L. 2018. Problem-based learning in teaching chemistry: enthalpy changes in systems. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(1):35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1366898

Baptist, K.J. & Subali, B. 2019. The teachers’ experiences in implementation of project based learning during teaching and learning of biology in senior high schools in Yogyakarta District. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1):1-8 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012026

Baser, D., Kopcha, T.J., & Ozden, M.Y. 2016. Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4):749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1047456

Cakır, N.K. 2017. Effect of 5E learning model on academic achievement, attitude and science process skills: Meta-analysis study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11):157-170. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i11.2649

Chai, C.S., Deng, F., Tsai, P.S., Koh, J.H.L., & Tsai, C.C. 2015. Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3):389–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9379-4

Chen, C.T. & She, H.C. 2014. the Effectiveness of Scientific Inquiry With/Without Integration of Scientific Reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9508-7

Chen, S.Y. & Liu, S.Y. 2020. Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 111(106418):1-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418

Duran, M. & Dökme, I. 2016. The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12):2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a

Eastwood, J.L., Sadler, T.D., Sherwood, R.D., & Schlegel, W.M. 2013. Students’ participation in an interdisciplinary, socioscientific issues based undergraduate human biology major and their understanding of scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 43(3):1051–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9298-x

Foote, L.M. 2013. Honing crisis communication skills: using interactive media and student-centered learning to develop agile leaders. Journal of Management Education, 37(1):79–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912455419

Gardner, J. & Belland, B.R. 2012. A conceptual framework for organizing active learning experiences in biology instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(4):465–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9338-8

Getenet, S.T., Beswick, K., & Callingham, R. 2016. Professionalizing in- service teachers’ focus on technological pedagogical and content knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1):19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9306-4

Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. 2012. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5

Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. 2015. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7

Haak, D.C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. 2011. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034):1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204820

Hadinugrahaningsih, T., Rahmawati, Y., & Ridwan, A. 2017. Developing 21st century skills in chemistry classrooms: Opportunities and challenges of STEAM integration. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(03008):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995107

Halim, A.S., Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S.A., Olsen, L.J., Gere, A.R., & Shultz, G.V. 2018. Identifying and remediating student misconceptions in introductory biology via writing-to-learn assignments and peer review. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-10-0212

Halimah, M., Sanjaya, Y., Tresnawati, C., & Nurdiani, N. 2019. Use of butterfly house as learning media to improve creative thinking skills of pre-service biology teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022072

Haviz, M. 2015. Cooperative learning model on developmental of biology. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(10):1298–1304. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-10-14

Herpiana, R., Rosidin, U., & Abdurrahman, A. 2019. Development of instruments to train critical and creative thinking skills in physics assessment for high school students’ learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012046

Holland, D. D., & Piper, R. T. 2016. Testing a technology integration education model for millennial preservice teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(2):196–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115615129

Howard, D.R. & Miskowski, J.A. 2005. Using a module-based laboratory to incorporate inquiry into a large cell biology course. Cell Biology Education, 4:249–260. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-09-0052

Hurlbut, A.R. 2018. Online vs. traditional learning in teacher education: a comparison of student progress. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4):248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1509265

Jia, Y., Oh, Y.J., Sibuma, B., LaBanca, F., & Lorentson, M. 2016. Measuring twenty-first century skills: development and validation of a scale for in-service and pre-service teachers. Teacher Development, 20(2):229–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530. 2016.1143870

Juhanda, A., Rustaman, N.Y., & Wulan, A.R. 2019. The profile of logical thinking biology prospective teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(022114):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022114

Jumrodah, J., Liliasari, S., & Adisendjaja, Y.H. 2019. Profile of pre-service biology teachers critical thinking skills based on learning project toward sustainable development. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(022097):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022097

Kanapathy, S., Lee, K. E., Mokhtar, M., Sved Zakaria, S.Z., Sivapalan, S., & Zahidi, A.M. 2018. The integration of sustainable development concept in Chemistry curriculum: A conceptual framework for the case of Pusat PERMAT ApintarTM Negara. Proceedings 1st International STEAM Education Conference, p.303–308. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467107

Khlaisang, J. & Koraneekij, P. 2019. Open online assessment management system platform and instrument to enhance the information, media, and ICT literacy skills of 21st century learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7):111–127. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9953

Kim, D. & Bolger, M. 2017. Analysis of korean elementary pre-service teachers’ changing attitudes about integrated STEAM pedagogy through developing lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4):587–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9709-3

Koenig, J.A. 2011. Assessing 21st Century Skills: Summary of a Workshop. In National Academies Press. National Research Council.

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. 2018. Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1):103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Lee, J. & Martin, L. 2017. Investigating students’ perceptions of motivating factors of online class discussions. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(5):148–172.

Leibfarth, F.A., Russell, M.G., Langley, D.M., Seo, H., Kelly, L.P., Carney, D.W., Sello, J.K., & Jamison, T.F. 2018. Continuous-flow chemistry in undergraduate education: sustainable conversion of reclaimed vegetable oil into biodiesel. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(8):1371–1375. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00719

Longo, C.M. 2016. Changing the instructional model: Utilizing blended learning as a tool of inquiry instruction in middle school science. Middle School Journal, 47(3):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2016.1135098

Lung, M. 2012. A thematic approach: making a biology course relevant & process-oriented. The American Biology Teacher, 61(1):18–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450604

Maryuningsih, Y., Hidayat, T., Riandi, R., & Rustaman, N.Y. 2019. Critical thinking skills of prospective biology teacher on the chromosomal basic of inheritance learning through online discussion forums. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022090

Matsko, K.K., Ronfeldt, M., Nolan, H.G., Klugman, J., Reininger, M., & Brockman, S.L. 2020. Cooperating teacher as model and coach: what leads to student teachers’ perceptions of preparedness?. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1):41–62. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0022487118791992

Michalopoulou, E., Shallcross, D.E., Atkins, E., Tierney, A., Norman, N.C., Preist, C., O’Doherty, S., Saunders, R., Birkett, A., Willmore, C., & Ninos, I. 2019. The end of simple problems: repositioning chemistry in higher education and society using a systems thinking approach and the united nations’ sustainable development goals as a framework. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12):2825–2835. https://doi.org/10. 1021/acs.jchemed.9b00270

Moedjiono, S., Nurcahyadi, & Kusdaryono, A. 2018. Media Interactive Learning and biology subjects implementation with augmented reality application. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computing, 2018 January, p.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC.2017.8280626

Nagarajan, S. & Overton, T. 2019. Promoting systems thinking using project- and problem-based learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12):2901-2909 https://doi.org/ 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00358

National Research Council. 2009. How the new biology can address societal challenges. in a new biology for the 21 st century; Ensuring the United States Leads the Coming Biology Revolution.

Ndlovu, M.C. & Mostert, I. 2018. Teacher perceptions of moodle and throughput in a blended learning programme for in-service secondary school mathematics teachers. Africa Education Review, 15(2):131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627. 2016.1241667

Nerita, S., Hartati, Y.S., Maizeli, A., & Afza, A. 2019. Practicality of handout based on guided discovery method in process evaluation and learning outcomes of biology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022081

Nerita, S., Maizeli, A., & Afza, A. 2017. Student Analysis of Handout Development based on Guided Discovery Method in Process Evaluation and Learning Outcomes of Biology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(2):012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012006

Osman, K., Hiong, L.C., & Vebrianto, R. 2013. 21st Century biology: An interdisciplinary approach of biology, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102:188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2013.10.732

Parishan, N., Jafari, E.M., & Nosrat, F. 2011. The effect of technology enabled active learning (teal) method in biology on the academic achievements of students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28:542–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro. 2011.11.104

Qamari, C.N. & Ridwan, M.R. 2017. Implementation of Android-based augmented reality as learning and teaching media of dicotyledonous plants learning materials in biology subject. Proceeding - 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology: Theory and Application of IT for Education, Industry and Society in Big Data Era, 2018 January,p.441–446. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITech.2017.8257153

Quattrucci, J. G. 2018. Problem-Based approach to teaching advanced chemistry laboratories and developing students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(2):259–266. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00558

Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., & Siahaan, P. 2020. Creative thinking skills of prospective physics teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022012

Romine, W.L., Sadler, T.D., & Wulff, E.P. 2017. Conceptualizing student affect for science and technology at the middle school level: development and implementation of a Measure of Affect in Science and Technology (MAST). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(5):534–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9697-x

Saptarani, D., Widodo, A., & Purwianingsih, W. 2019. Biology teachers and high school students perceptions about STEM learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042007

Saputri, A.C., Sajidan, S., & Rinanto, Y. 2018. Critical thinking skills profile of senior high school students in Biology learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012002

Scantlebury, K., Boone, W., Kahle, J.B., & Fraser, B.J. 2001. Design, validation, and use of an evaluation instrument for monitoring systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6):646–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1024

Schiffer, J.M., Lyman, J., Byrd, D., Silverstein, H., & Halls, M.D. 2020. Microplastics outreach program: a systems-thinking approach to teach high school students about the chemistry and impacts of plastics. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(1):137–142. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00249

Schwarzman, M.R. & Buckley, H.L. 2019. Not just an academic exercise: systems thinking applied to designing safer alternatives. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12):2984–2992. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00345

Setty, S. & Kosinski-collins, M.S. 2015. A model inquiry-based genetics experiment for introductory biology students. The American Biology Teacher, 77(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.1.6

Shidiq, A.S. 2016. Pembelajaran Sains Kimia Berbasis Etnosains Untuk Meningkatkan Minat dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Seminar Nasional Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia VIII, p.227–236.

Shidiq, A.S., Masykuri, M., & Susanti, E. 2014. Pengembangan instrumen penilaian two-tier multiple choice untuk mengukur keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Pada Materi Kelarutan Dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan Untuk Siswa Sma / Ma Kelas Xi. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3(4):83–92.

Shidiq, A.S., Masykuri, M., & Susanti, E. 2015. Analisis higher order thinking skills (hots) menggunakan instrumen two-tier multiple choice pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan untuk siswa kelas XI SMA N 1 Surakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 2015 November, p.2015–2159.

Shidiq, A.S. & Yamtinah, S. 2019. Pre-service chemistry teachers’ attitudes and attributes toward the twenty-first century skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4): 042014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042014

So, H.J., Ryoo, D., Park, H., & Choi, H. 2019. What constitutes korean pre-service teachers’ competency in steam education: examining the multi-functional structure. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1):47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0410-5

Suyanto, S. 2017. A reflection on the implementation of a new curriculum in Indonesia: A crucial problem on school readiness. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(100008):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995218

Tiffany, F., Surya, E., Panjaitan, A., & Syahputra, E. 2017. Analysis mathematical communication skills student at the grade. International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education, 3(2):2160–2164.

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A.M., & Osman, K. 2012. Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

Ulger, K. 2019. Comparing the effects of art education and science education on creative thinking in high school students. Arts Education Policy Review, 120(2):57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1334612

Urbani, J.J.M., Truesdell, E., Roshandel, S., Michaels, R., Truesdell, E., Anderman, E.M., Sinatra, G.M., Gray, D.L.L., Demirel, M., Fadel, C., Burkhardt, G., Monsour, M., Valdez, G., Gunn, C., Dawson, M., Lemke, C., Martin, C., Povee, K., … Truesdell, E. 2017. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educacion Quimica, 1(1):1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.303

Urbani, J., Roshandel, S., Michaels, R., & Truesdell, E. 2017. Developing and modeling 21st century skills with preservice teacher. Teacher Education Quarterly, 44:27–50.

Van-Rooy, W.S. 2012. Using information and communication technology (ICT) to the maximum: Learning and teaching biology with limited digital technologies. Research in Science and Technological Education, 30(1):65-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02635143.2011.653877

Wafula, W.N. & Ongunya, O. 2016. Project based learning on students’ performance in the concept of classification of organisms among secondary schools in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16):25–31.

Walker, L. & Warfa, A.R.M. 2017. Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) marginally effects student achievement measures but substantially increases the odds of passing a course. PLoS ONE, 12(10):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0186203

Weitzel, H. & Blank, R. 2020. Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Peer Dialogues between Pre-Service Biology Teachers in the Planning of Science Lessons. Results of an Intervention Study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1):75–93. https://doi. org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1664874

Widodo, A. 2017. Experienced biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) on photosynthesis. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848(060017):1-4. https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.4983985

Wilke, R.R. & Straits, W.J. 2001. The effects of discovery learning in a lower-division biology course. American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 25(4):134–141. https://doi.org/10.1152/advances.2001.25.2.62

Windiastuti, E.P., Suyono, & Kuntjor, S. 2018. Development of the guided inquiry student worksheet for biology grade 11th Senior High School. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 7(2):1513–1518.

Yang, K.K., Lee, L., Hong, Z.R., & Lin, H.S. 2016. Investigation of effective strategies for developing creative science thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 38(13):2133–2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1230685




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i3.20162

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Anda Juanda, Aisha Nur Maulida, Ria Yulia Gloria, Dindin Nasrudin

View JPSI Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.