EFL students’ strategies in answering the listening section of the Longman TOEFL

Tengku Maya Silviyanti, Rahayu Ramadhani, Iskandar Abdul Samad

Abstract


This study investigated the EFL students’ strategies in answering the Listening section of the Paper-based TOEFL test. The samples of this research were purposively selected consisting of 30 English major students at Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. The samples were selected based on their recent TOEFL scores. All the selected samples achieved low TOEFL scores, especially for the Listening section. The data were gained by means of closed questionnaire and interviews. The interviews were conducted with three students of the 30 students and they were selected randomly. The results of the questionnaire revealed that the top three strategies the students used when answering the TOEFL questions ranged from the strategies of (1) ‘before listening, I tried to anticipate the topic by looking at the answer in the test book’, (2) ‘while listening, I tried to determine the topic or main idea for each conversation, and (3) ‘before listening, I tried to anticipate what the questions would be and I listened specifically for the answer’. This imply that a majority of students used strategies only to answer part B (dialogues) and part C (monologues) of the TOEFL Listening section. These parts were considered more difficult since many students were not familiar with the topics. Meanwhile, strategies for part A were neglected. These students often forgot to choose answers in this section. Unfortunately, strategies for part A are also important because they can achieve higher scores if the 30 questions in this part are answered correctly.


Keywords


listening; TOEFL; Longman; strategies; EFL students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arono, M. (2015). The relationship between listening strategy performance and critical listening ability of Indonesian students. Al Ta’lim Journal, 22(1), 81-87.

Bahri, S., Nadhira, C., & Silviyanti, T. M. (2016). The effect of captioned video on students’ listening comprehension [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 1st English Education International Conference in conjunction with the 2nd Reciprocal Graduate Research Symposium of the Consortium of Asia Pacific Education Universities (RGRS-CAPEU), Banda Aceh.

Carrel, P. L., Dunkel, P. A., & Mollaun, P. (2002). The effects of notetaking, lecture length, and topic on the listening component of TOEFL 2000. Educational Testing Service.

Educational Testing Service. (2019). The TOEFL Test. ETS.org. http://www.ets.org/toefl/?WT.ac=etshome_toefl_flagship_180417

Green, G. (2004). “Listening makes my brain hurts”: Issues of listening for students who are speakers of language other than English. Directions: Journal of Educational Studies, 26(2), 51-71.

Hamouda, A. (2013). An investigation of listening comprehension problems encountered by Saudi students in the EL listening classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(2), 113–155.

Heffernan, N. (2006). Successful strategies: Test-taking strategies for the TOEFL. The Journal of ASIA TEFL, 3(1), 151-170.

Kaneko, M. (2015). Vocabulary size required for the TOEFL iBT Listening Section. The Language Teacher, 39(1), 9-14.

Mahdavy, B. (2008). The role of Multiple Intelligences (MI) in listening proficiency: A comparison of TOEFL and IELTS Listening Test from MI perspective. The Asian EFL Journal, 10(3), 109-126.

Matsuoka, Y. (2009). Possible strategies for listening comprehension: Applying the concept of conversational implicature and adjacency pairs to understand speaker intention in the TOEFL listening section. Accent Asia, 3(2), 27-56.

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL Test. Addison-Wesley Longman.

Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

Samad, I. A. (2016). Improving students’ competence in the thesis defence examination in two universities in Aceh, Indonesia. (Doctoral dissertation). University of New England, Armidale.

Samad, I. A., Jannah, M., & Fitriani, S. S. (2017). EFL students’ strategies dealing with common difficulties in TOEFL Reading Comprehension Section. IJoLE: International Journal of Language Education, 1(1), 29-36.

Silviyanti, T. M. (2014). Looking into EFL students’ perception in listening by using English movie videos on YouTube. Studies in English Language and Education, 1(1), 42-58.

Silviyanti, T. M., Samad, I. A., & Rahmadhani, R. (2017). The students’ problems in listening to paper-based TOEFL Test [Paper presentation]. Proceedings on National Conference on Teachers’ Professional Development Banda Aceh.

Warfield, W., Laribee, R., & Geyer, R. W. (2013). Examining results and establishing benchmark data from TOEFL ITP test. American Academic and Scholarly Research Journal, 5(3), 191-198.

Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Prentice Hall.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.13007

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.