Interjection Bah! in Batak Toba: A natural semantic metalanguage approach

Bertova Simanihuruk, Mulyadi Mulyadi

Abstract


Interjection is the word used to show spontaneous expression. Batak language has a specific emotive interjection Bah! which is different from other interjections in the language. The objectives of this study are to find the meanings of interjection Bah! and to classify the elements of feelings of this interjection. This is a descriptive qualitative study employing the semantic explication method of the Natural Semantic Metalanguage approach. The data was collected from the interjection Bah! in a Batak Toba short story entitled Mangongkal Holi. The data were obtained by the attentive observation method and tapping technique. The methods used for data analysis were the distribution and contextual method. The results of this study showed that there are five meanings of the interjection Bah! They are astonishment, disappointment, confusion, surprise, and amazement. Meanwhile, those meanings express two elements of feelings, which are the positive feeling element (i.e. surprise and amazement), and the negative feeling element (i.e. astonishment, disappointment, and confusion). The revelation of the various meanings of Bah! is expected to provide richer understanding on its use in communication, and to further avoid miscommunication between different ethnics in Indonesia which each has their own mother tongue.


Keywords


Batak Toba; short story; interjection Bah!; natural semantic metalanguage; elements of feelings

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ameka, F. K. (1992a). Introduction to interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(2/3), 101-118.

Ameka, F. K. (1992b). The meaning of phatic and conative interjections. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(2/3), 245–271.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education. Allyn and Bacon.

Bussmann, H. (2006). Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. Routledge.

Goddard, C. (2008). Natural Semantic Metalanguage: The state of the art. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Cross-linguistic semantics (pp. 1-34). Mouton de Gruyter.

Goddard, C. (2014). Interjections and emotions (with special reference to “surprise” and “disgust”). Sage.

Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. Oxford University Press.

Kockelman, P. (2003). The meanings of interjections in Q’eqchi’ Maya: From emotive reaction to social and discursive action. Current Anthropology, 44(4), 467-490.

Levisen, C. (2019). Laughter interjections: Contributions to a lexical anthropology of humour (with special reference to Danish). Scandinavian Studies in Language, 10(1), 110-130.

Mao, A. M. (2017). Conceptuality and context - sensitivity of emotive interjections. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(1), 41-51.

Mulyadi, & Siregar, R. K. (2006). Aplikasi teori metabahasa makna alami dalam kajian makna [Applying the theory of natural meaning to the study of meaning]. LOGAT: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, 2(2), 69-75.

Norrick, N. R. (2011). Interjections. In G. Andersen & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Pragmatics of society (pp. 243-292). De Gruyter.

Saragih, E. L. L., & Panggabean, S. (2013). Analisis interjeksi ba(H) dalam bahasa Batak Toba dengan menggunakan program PRAAT (studi kasus fonologi mahasiswa jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia FKIP Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan) [Ba(H) interjection analysis in the Toba Batak language using the PRAAT program (a phonological case study of students at the Indonesian Language and Literature Department of FKIP HKBP University Nommensen Medan). VISI, 21(1), 1215-1229.

Shalika, M. P., & Mulyadi. (2019). Cognitive interjection in Indonesian and Japanese. Humanika, 26(1), 32-39.

Stange, U. (2016). Emotive interjections in British English: A corpus-based study on variaton in acquisition, function and usage. John Benjamins Publishing.

Taavitsainen, I. (1995). Interjections in Early Modern English: From imitation of spoken to conventions of written language. In A. H. Jucker (Ed.), Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English (pp. 439-465). John Benjamin Publishing.

Tambunan, S. P. (1992). Torsatorsa hata Batak: Mangongkal holi. Selasar Pena Talenta.

Thompson, R. (2019). Tweaa! – A Ghanaian interjection of “contempt” in online political comments. Ampersands, 6, 1-7.

Wharton, T. (2003). Interjections, language, and the 'showing'/'saying' continuum. Pragmatics and Cognition, 11(1), 39-91.

Wierzbicka, A. (1992). The semantics of interjection. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(2/3), 159-192.

Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford University Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction (2 ed.). Mouten de Gruyer.

Yatno, T., Nurkamto, J., Tarjana, S. S., & Djatmika, D. (2018). Manner and meaning of interjection on medsos community in Facebook (the study of ethnolinguistic) (Paper presentation). Proceedings of International Seminar on Recent Language, Literature, and Local Culture Studies (BASA 2018), Solo Baru, Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15433

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.