Potential factors influencing the rhetorical patterns of research article discussion sections

Lulus Irawati

Abstract


The present study reports potential factors influencing the rhetorical patterns of research articles (RA) discussion sections. The study was conducted by utilizing descriptive qualitative research. The researcher purposefully focused on investigating 10 bilingual writers who wrote both one English and one Indonesian research article. The selected writers were those who had an educational background in language and language teaching. The interviews covered the interviewees’ background information, current activities, writing activities, and their rhetorical patterns of discussion sections. The interviews were conducted by utilizing the snowball technique to search for more information. The interview data were analyzed into some steps namely, transcribing the interview data, organizing data, summarizing data, and interpreting data. All data transcription was then categorized and coded. Research findings revealed that the writers’ choice of move structure could be as a result of learning from other people’s rhetorical patterns, believing themselves, having high self-confidence, having high writing frequency, and having high awareness in the micro and macrostructure of writing discussion sections. The Indonesian writers have opened their minds to learn and read other researchers’ articles and then determine whether the patterns are suitable for them or not. The writers’ starting point of experiencing to have their RA published made them believe in themselves and felt self-confident. Thus, the more they wanted to write RA, the higher they had writing frequency and awareness in the micro and macrostructure of writing discussion sections. 


Keywords


bilingual writers; potential factors; discussion sections; research articles; rhetorical patterns

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amirian, Z., Kassaian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2008). Genre analysis: An investigation of the discussion sections of applied linguistics research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 4(1), 39-63.

Arsyad, S. (2013). A genre-based analysis on discussion section of research articles in Indonesian written by Indonesian speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i4.3773

Arsyad, S., Purwo, B.K., & Adnan, Z. (2020). The argument style in research article discussions to support research findings in language studies. Studies in Language and Education, 7(2), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16626

Atai, M. R., & Falah, S. (2005, August 2-4). A contrastive genre analysis of result and discussion sections of applied linguistic research articles written by native and non-native English speakers with respect to evaluated entities and ascribed values [Paper presentation]. The 10th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Basthomi, Y. (2006). The rhetoric of research article introductions written in English by Indonesians [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004

Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). Toward a writing pedagogy of shuttling between languages: Learning from multilingual writers. College English, 68(6), 589-604. https://doi.org/10.2307/25472177

Djigić, G., Stojiljković, S., & Dosković, M. (2014). Basic personality dimensions and teachers’ self-efficacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1206

Guranda, M. (2014). The importance of adult’s personality traits and professional interests in career decision making. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.368

Harjanto, I. (1999). English academic writing features by Indonesian learners of English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Negeri Malang.

He, T. (2019). Personality facets, writing strategy use, and writing performance of college students learning English as a foreign language. SAGE Open, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861483

Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5

Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2003). A corpus-based investigation of scientific research articles: Linking move analysis with multidimensional analysis (Order No. 3107368) [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003

Liu, Y. (2007). Cultural factors and rhetorical patterns in classical Chinese argumentation. Intercultural Communication Studies, 16(1), 197.

Loi, C. K., Evans, M. S., Akkakoson, S., Ahmed, S., & Ahmed, S. (2015). Rhetorical patterns in the discussion sections of Malay research articles. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(2), 118-121. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijlll.2015.v1.23

Mardiansyah, R. (2018). A correlation between self-confidence and essay writing achievement. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 5(2), 154-166. https://doi.org/10.19109/ejpp.v5i2.2326

Maswana, S., Kanamaru, T., & Tajino, A. (2015). Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, 2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2014.12.002

Mirahayuni, N. K. (2002). Investigating generic structure of English research articles: Writing strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. TEFLIN Journal, 13(1), 22-57.

Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4

Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7

Rakhmawati, A. (2013). A comparison of Indonesian and English research articles written by Indonesian academics: Integrating perspectives on genre and rhetorical diversity [Doctoral dissertation, University of New England]. Rune. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16905

Rubio, F. (2021). Self-esteem and foreign language learning. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Subandrijo, E., & Susilo, S. (2007). Thought patterns reflected in the linguistic features in Indonesian and English letters written by Indonesians. TEFLIN Journal, 18(1), 43-67.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

van Weijen, D., van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2009). L1 use during L2 writing: An empirical study of a complex phenomenon. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.06.003




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.21267

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.