Retaining Literature in the Indonesian ELT Curriculum

Hamzah Puadi Ilyas

Abstract


This article presents serious independent arguments why literature needs to be retained in the Indonesian ELT (English Language Teaching) curriculum. In general, ELT curriculum nowadays seems to neglect the importance of literature since the introduction of the communicative approach. Three aspects are presented in connection with why the notion may need immediate application: (1) literature brings many advantages to Indonesian ELT learners; (2) literature can be used to teach critical thinking skills; and (3) critical thinking can be used to promote tolerance. This article is developed based on mainly the ideas of literature teaching proposed by Collie and Slater (1987), Lazar (1993), and Ghosn (2002). Hence, critical thinking and tolerance are values not getting serious attention in educational processes in this country even though these values have been included in the National educational objectives for Indonesia. 


Keywords


Literature; critical thinking; ELT; tolerance; English Language Teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agung, I. A. A. G. (1993). Kenangan masa lampau: Zaman colonial Hindia Belanda dan zaman pendudukan Jepang di Bali [Past memory: The era of Dutch and Japanese colonialism in Bali]. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Aubrey, C., Ghent, K., & Kanira, E. (2012). Enhancing thinking skills in early childhood. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(4), 332-348.

Akyel, A., & Yalcin, E. (1990). Literature in the EFL class: A study of goal-achievement incongruence. ELT Journal, 44(3), 174-180.

Brumfit, C. J. (1981). Reading skills and the study of literature in a foreign language. System, 9(3), 241-248.

Campbell, N. (1987). Adapted literary texts and the EFL reading programme. ELT Journal, 41(2), 132-135.

Collie, J., & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Commeyras, M. (1990). Analyzing a critical-thinking reading lesson. Teaching and Education, 6(3), 201-214.

Costello, P.J.M. (2000). Thinking skills and early childhood education. London: David Fulton.

Elliot, R. (1990). Encouraging reader-response to literature in ESL situations. ELT Journal, 44(3), 191-198.

Fisher, R. (2008). Teaching thinking: Philosophical enquiry in the classroom (3rd ed.). London: Continuum.

Ghosn, I. (2002). Four good reasons to use literature in primary school ELT. ELT Journal, 56(2), 172-179.

Hill, D. R. (2008). Graded readers in English. ELT Journal, 62(2), 184-204.

Janarto, H. G. (2000). Karlina Umar Wirahadikusumah: Bukan sekedar istri prajurit [Karlina Umar Wirahadikusumah: Not simply a soldier’s wife]. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Janopoulos, M. (1986). The relationship between pleasure reading and second language writing proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 763-768.

Lam, C. (2012). Continuing Lipman’s and Sharp’s pioneering work on philosophy for children: Using Harry to foster critical thinking in Hong Kong students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(2), 187-203.

Lao, C. Y., & Krashen, S. (2000). The impact of popular literature study on literacy development in EFL: More evidence for the power of reading. System, 38, 261-270.

Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lazar, G. (1994). Using literature at lower levels. ELT Journal, 48(2), 115-124.

Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (1997). Extensive reading in English as a foreign language. System, 25, 91-102.

McDonald, L. (2004). Moving from reader response to critical reading: Developing 10-11-year-olds' ability as analytical readers of literary texts. Literacy, 38(1), 17-25.

Moore, T. (2011). Critical thinking: Seven definitions in search of a concept. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 506-522.

Paul, R. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park, CA: Sonoma State University.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.

Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51(2), 144-156.

Shelton-Strong, J. S. (2012). Literature circles in ELT. ELT Journal, 66(2), 214-223.

Talib, I. b. S. (1992). Why not teach non-native English literature? ELT Journal, 46(1), 51-55.

Urlaub, P. (2012). Reading strategies and literature instruction: Teaching learners to generate questions to foster literary reading in the second language. System, 40(2), 296-304.

Van, T. T. M. (2009). The relevance of literary analysis to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. English Teaching FORUM, 47(3), 2-9.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v3i1.3384

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2018 Syiah Kuala University

Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.