Problems With Section Two ITP TOEFL Test

Rizki Ananda

Abstract


This study was designed to investigate (1) the difficulties faced by EFL university students with section two of the ITP, and (2) whether part A or part B was more difficult for them and why. A number of 26 students from two different universities, Syiah Kuala University and the State Islamic University Ar-Raniry were the samples for the test. The data was obtained from a multiple choice questionnaire test consisting of 46 questions, each with 4 answers to choose from. The results showed that inversions (12%), subject-verb agreements (10%), adverb clause connectors (7%), passives (6%), reduced adjective clauses (5%), parallel structures (5%) and use of verbs (5%) were the most difficult questions for the students. Furthermore, they felt that part B was more difficult than part A, as finding an error in a sentence was harder than completing a sentence from a multiple choice. Furthermore, the length of questions in part A did not affect the amount of time the students spent to complete part A and did not cause them to panic. Also, unfamiliar words in part A were not regarded as a problem by the students. Hence, TOEFL teachers and trainers are highly encouraged to pay more attention to doing study exercises for the seven topics with the highest percentages above in part A and also to more practice for part B.


Keywords


ITP TOEFL; structure; written expression; questionnaire; multiple choice tests

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abboud, Z. A. R., & Hussein, N. J. (2011). The difficulties faced by advanced Iraqi foreign learners in passing the ITP TOEFL test. Journal of Basrah Researchers (Humanities Series), 36(4): 110-138.

Aridah. (2004). Students’ preferences and reactions to teacher feedback. In B. Y. Cahyono & U. Widiati (Eds.). The tapestry of English language teaching and learning in Indonesia (pp. 195-203). Malang: State University of Malang Press.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hambali, M. (2008). Shortcut strategies in analyzing sentence structures in TOEFL. In C. D. Diem & Kasmansyah. Lingua: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(2) 82-88.

Mahmud, M. (2014). The EFL students’ problems in answering the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL): A study in Indonesian context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(12): 2581-2587.

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test: Preparation for computer and paper test. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Pyle, M. A., & Page, M. E. N. (2002). TOEFL preparation guide: Test of English as a foreign language. New Delhi: Wiley Dreamtech India (P) Ltd.

Sharpe, P. J. (2004). How to prepare for the TOEFL: Test of English as a foreign language. New York: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.

Sulistyo, G. H. (2009). TOEFL in a brief historical overview from PBT to IBT. Bahasa dan Seni, 37(2): 116-127.

Sudijono, A. (2006). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Wright, S. W., & Sukur, S. G. (2012). Soal-soal grammar TOEFL. Yogyakarta: Kalarana Press.

The TOEFL ITP Assessment Series. (2013). Test taker handbook. Princeton, NJ: ETS.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v3i1.3387

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.