A pragmatic study of speech as an instrument of power: Analysis of the 2016 USA presidential debate

Misyi Gusthini, Cece Sobarna, Rosaria Mita Amalia

Abstract


This research was aimed at analyzing the speeches of Donald Trump and of Hillary Clinton in the USA Presidential candidates’ debates as instruments of power. The data is a presidential final debate video of Trump and Clinton made in September 2016 which has been converted into a transcript. The data analyzing technique is divided into three steps: 1) describing the context, 2) analyzing the illocutionary acts, and 3) analyzing the power dimensions. The results of this research show that the speakers use the speech act as an instrument of power with classifications of representative, commissive and expressive. In this regard, the researchers found that the speakers demonstrated their power to try to convince the voters in their society to trust them to be the president. The research results also showed that the usage of speech in debate as an instrument of power can influence the voters especially on Election Day.

Keywords


speech act classifications; power dimensions; contextual meaning; pragmatic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altikriti, S. (2016). Persuasive speech acts in Barrack Obama's Inaugural Speeches (2009, 2013) and The Last State of the Union Address (2016). International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 47-66.

Amalia, R. M. (2017). Use of implicit performative utterances at University of Padjadjaran and at University of Pennsylvania. Studies in English Language and Education, 4(1), 66-75.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ayeomoni, O. M., & Akinkuolere, O. S. (2012). A pragmatic analysis of victory and inaugural speeches of President Umaru Musa Yar' Adua. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 461-468.

Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. London: Routledge.

Cicognani, A. (2006). Defining a design language in a text-based virtual community (Thesis). University of Sydney, Sydney.

Crystal, D. (1980). The Cambridge encylopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatic and discourse. London: Routledge.

Danang. (2012). Speech act analysis on Barrack Obama and McCain Presidential Debate 2008. (Bachelor), Univeristas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung.

Dijk, T. A. v. (1997). A dictionary of communication and media studies. London: Edward Arnold.

Gunarwan, A. (2004). Dari pragmatik ke pengajaran bahasa [From pragmatics to language teaching]. (Bachelor), IKIP Negeri Singaraja, Singaraja.

Hashim, S. S. M. (2015). Speech acts in political speeches. Journal of Modern Education Review, 5(7), 699-706.

Lavrentsova, E. (2010). Primary dimensions of stratification. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 8(3), 254-257.

Perloff, R. M. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlabum.

Sameer, I. H. (2017). Analysis of speech act patterns in two Egyptian Inaugural speeches. Studies in English Language and Education, 4(2), 134-147.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. London: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind and knowledge: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol 7 (pp. 344-369). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1-23.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metodologi penelitian [Research methods]. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Targadi, M. E. (2011). Lauren Weisberger's The Devil Wears Prada and Candace Bushnell's Lipstick Jungle: A study of chick-lit. (Bachelor), Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung.

Weber, M. (1978). Status groups and classes. Economy and Society, 1(1), 302-310.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i1.6906

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2018 Syiah Kuala University

Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.