The effect of explicit and implicit teaching vocabulary on Iranian EFL learners vocabulary

Seyyed Taghi Yaghoubi, Fatemeh Seyyedi


This research aimed to find out and compare the effects of two types of teaching- learning vocabularies: explicit vs. implicit teaching-learning on building the EFL vocabulary of Iranian EFL students. The participants of the study were 100 intermediate females EFL students from four English classes. The instruments of this study included a PET test, a pre-test and a post-test. The researchers divided the sample into two groups which were given 15 sessions of treatment; the vocabulary items were taught explicitly to the Explicit Group (EG) by giving them the definitions of the words. However, to the second group, the Implicit Group (IG) the vocabulary items were taught implicitly by giving them example sentences in which the new words were used. After the treatments, a post-test was taken by the participants to examine the effects. The results showed that although both methods of teaching vocabulary were found to be effective, there was a significant difference between the post-test scores of the two groups; the EG which received explicit teaching-learning learnt much more vocabulary than the IG that received implicit teaching-learning of vocabulary. The findings of this study have several pedagogical implications in that they can make EFL teachers in Iran clearer about the more effective way for EFL classes to teach and learn vocabulary.


Implicit teaching; explicit teaching; vocabulary

Full Text:



Ausubel, D. P. (1964). Adults versus children in second‐language learning: Psychological considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 48(7), 420-424.

Berne, J. I., & Blachowicz, C. L. (2008). What reading teachers say about vocabulary instruction: Voices from the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 62(4), 314-323.

Berry, V. (1994). Current assessment issues and practices in Hong Kong: A preview. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Language in Education Conference, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Brown, D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, N. Y.: Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.

Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2002). Vocabulary. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 42-47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coady, J., Magoto, J., Hubbard, P., Graney, J., & Mokhtari, K. (1993). High frequency vocabulary and reading proficiency in ESL readers. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary acquisition (pp. 289-298). Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.

Dimas, H. M. S. (2009). Teachers' own identities concocting a potion to treat the syndrome of Doctor Jekyll and Edward Hyde in teachers. Íkala, 10(1), 43-59.

Ellis, N. C. (1994). Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 211-282). London: Academic Press.

Greenwood, S. C., & Flanigan, K. (2007). Overlapping vocabulary and comprehension: Context clues complement semantic gradients. The Reading Teacher, 61(3), 249-254.

Harmon, J. M., Wood, K. D., & Kiser, K. (2009). Promoting vocabulary learning with the interactive word wall. Middle School Journal, 40(3), 58-63.

Hulstijn, J. H. (Ed.) (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hulstijn, J. H., & Béjoint, H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental learning. In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113-125). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539-558.

Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(1), 23-59.

Jenkins, J. R., Matlock, B., & Slocum, T. A. (1989). Two approaches to vocabulary instruction: The teaching of individual word meanings and practice in deriving word meaning from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 215–235.

Joe, A. (1995). Text-based tasks and incidental vocabulary learning. Second Language Research, 11(2), 149-158.

Karimi, M. N. (2013). Enhancing L2 students' listening transcription ability through a focus on morphological awareness. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(5), 451-459.

Maiguashca, R. U. (1993). Teaching and learning vocabulary in a second language: Past, present and future directions. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 83-100.

Manzo, A. V., Manzo, U. C., & Thomas, M. M. (2006). Rationale for systematic vocabulary development: Antidote for state mandates. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(7), 610-619.

Marzban, A., & Kamalian, K. (2013). Effects of implicit versus explicit vocabulary instruction on intermediate EFL learners' vocabulary knowledge. ELT Voice, 3(6), 84-95.

McCarthy, M., O'Dell, F., & Mark, G. (1999). English vocabulary in use: Elementary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mirzaii, M. (2012). Implicit vs explicit vocabulary learning: Which approach serves long-term recall better? 3L: Language, Linguistics and Literature, The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(2), 1-12.

Nassaji, H. (2006). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 387-401.

Neuman, S. B., & Dwyer, J. (2009). Missing in action: Vocabulary instruction in pre‐K. The Reading Teacher, 62(5), 384-392.

Nezakat-Alhossaini, M., Youhanaee, M., & Moinzadeh, A. (2014). Impact of explicit instruction on EFL learners' implicit and explicit knowledge: A case of English relative clauses. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 183-199.

Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (Eds.). (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition (Vol. 55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, R. (2000). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48 (2), 281-317.

Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (Vol. 2035). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, F. (1998). The book of learning and forgetting. New York: Teachers College Press.

Subon, F. (2013). Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms in the speech of men and women in the Malaysian context. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 13(3), 67-79.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.

Winter, B., & Reber, A. S. (Eds.). (1994). Implicit learning and the acquisition of natural languages. London: Academic Press.

Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 121-140.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 Syiah Kuala University

Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.