The analysis of speech acts patterns in two Egyptian inaugural speeches

Imad Hayif Sameer

Abstract


The theory of speech acts, which clarifies what people do when they speak, is not about individual words or sentences that form the basic elements of human communication, but rather about particular speech acts that are performed when uttering words. A speech act is the attempt at doing something purely by speaking. Many things can be done by speaking.  Speech acts are studied under what is called speech act theory, and belong to the domain of pragmatics. In this paper, two Egyptian inaugural speeches from El-Sadat and El-Sisi, belonging to different periods were analyzed to find out whether there were differences within this genre in the same culture or not. The study showed that there was a very small difference between these two speeches which were analyzed according to Searle’s theory of speech acts. In El Sadat’s speech, commissives came to occupy the first place. Meanwhile, in El–Sisi’s speech, assertives occupied the first place. Within the speeches of one culture, we can find that the differences depended on the circumstances that surrounded the elections of the Presidents at the time. Speech acts were tools they used to convey what they wanted and to obtain support from their audiences. 


Keywords


Speech Act; Pragmatics; Discourse; Critical Discourse Analysis; Inaugural Speech

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do thing with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bussmann, H. (1998). Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. London: Taylor & Francis.

Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1990). Presidents creating the presidency: Deeds done in words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Crystal, D. (1991). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dijk, T. A. V. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. London: SAGE Publications.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In A. McHoul M. Rapley (Eds), How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods. London: Continuum.

Ferrara, A. (1980). An extended theory of speech acts: Appropriateness conditions for subordinate acts in sequences. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Moore, L. B. (2016). Second terms, first impressions: A comparison of presidential inaugural addresses by Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush (Doctor), West Texas A & M University, Texas.

Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. Illinois: Chicago University Press.

Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Saeed, J. I. (2006). Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publising.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Semantics. London: T.J. Press.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Talbot, M. (2007). Media discourse: representation and interaction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Wales, K. (1989). A dictionary of stylistics. California: Longman.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v4i2.7271

Refbacks



Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.